[Sun Mar 11 15:32:58 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (333.7, 172.6) = 12 1 42.13 -19 2 22.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 135.2 +/- 22.1
  Background counts = 169.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Sun Mar 11 15:32:58 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.47'
[Sun Mar 11 15:35:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 11 15:35:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.17"
[Sun Mar 11 15:35:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.930
[Sun Mar 11 15:35:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 11.17"
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Sun Mar 11 16:27:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 17:30:46 2012] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 27 at 14.744849 pixels away
[Sun Mar 11 17:30:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 17:30:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 17:30:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 17:30:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 17:30:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 17:31:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 11 17:31:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.17"
[Sun Mar 11 17:31:03 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.930
[Sun Mar 11 17:31:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 1, mean size = 11.17"
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.csv
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Sun Mar 11 18:25:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 286.959000, observed total counts = 243.000000
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 27
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:21 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28983.016083, 14969.334702, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:21 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27_src.reg
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:21 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (296, 135) - (371, 210)
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:21 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28983.016083, 14969.334702, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31100.518920, 15942.497400, 562.145616, 562.145616, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Mar 11 19:27:21 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27.gif
[Sun Mar 11 19:52:44 2012] Mean detx,y = (-3310.78, 12622.44) 
[Sun Mar 11 19:52:49 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun Mar 11 19:53:20 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun Mar 11 19:53:21 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Mar 11 19:53:21 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27_bgd.pi.gz
[Mon Mar 12 00:18:01 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Mon Mar 12 00:18:01 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon Mar 12 00:59:26 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon Mar 12 00:59:26 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Mar 12 00:59:27 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon Mar 12 00:59:27 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00431, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0500070501_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27.arf
[Mon Mar 12 00:59:27 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon Mar 12 00:59:27 2012] Updating source flux to 2.4e-14
[Mon Mar 12 01:00:58 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting