[Tue Jun 19 13:18:57 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (300.3, 283.5) = 5 25 14.12 -69 39 12.6
  Extent = 43.5" x 43.5", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 2513.5 +/- 93.0
  Background counts = 7640.6
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.004

[Tue Jun 19 13:18:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.09'
[Tue Jun 19 13:31:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 19 13:31:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.97"
[Tue Jun 19 13:31:44 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.131
[Tue Jun 19 13:31:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 6.97"
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Jun 20 06:34:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0414180501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Source 5 is offset by -6.143993 and -5.863454 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.773127 x 3.773127, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:22 2012] Source is confused with source 1
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.97"
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.131
[Wed Jun 20 20:59:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 6.97"