[Fri Mar 23 10:28:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (481.1, 228.2) = 17 3 59.47 -22 11 35.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 81.6 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 20.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Mar 23 10:28:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.19'
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.52"
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.075
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.52"
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 351.999000, observed total counts = 352.000000
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.299540 pixels
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] 351.620500 total counts/ 298.453000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.077572
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.299540 pixels
  Position = (481.2, 228.4) = 17 3 59.42 -22 11 30.8
  Extent = 6.6 (4.9-9.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 53.2 +/- 18.8
  Background counts = 298.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0008
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.62"
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.978
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 6.62"
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:27 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 281.996000, observed total counts = 282.000000
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.049803 pixels
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] 278.798900 total counts/ 230.036000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.215079
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.049803 pixels
  Position = (481.3, 228.5) = 17 3 59.42 -22 11 30.6
  Extent = 6.3 (4.6-8.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 48.8 +/- 16.7
  Background counts = 230.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9