[Fri Mar 23 10:28:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (482.5, 300.3) = 17 3 59.07 -22 6 18.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.0 +/- 11.3
  Background counts = 22.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Fri Mar 23 10:28:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.34'
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.10"
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.993
[Fri Mar 23 10:32:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 13.10"
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 13:10:03 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 16.814820 pixels away
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.10 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.10"
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.993
[Fri Mar 23 16:02:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 13.10"
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6 appears to have run properly
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 23 17:48:26 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0413780101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 12.591427 pixels away
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 23 20:11:52 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0