[Sat Jun 15 02:27:01 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (481.1, 261.2) = 8 47 29.95 -45 39 37.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 124.7 +/- 21.5
  Background counts = 134.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Sat Jun 15 02:27:10 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.52'
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.19"
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:43 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.782
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 13.19"
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:27:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3414.160000, observed total counts = 1568.000000
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Warning: source 75 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 10.972442 pixels away
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:20 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.19"
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:35 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 49, mask sum = 39, frac = 0.782
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 13.19"
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:39 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:39 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Sat Jun 15 02:28:39 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Warning: source 59 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 16.901866 pixels away
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 02:29:05 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9