[Thu Mar  8 18:38:56 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (313.8, 225.1) = 8 48 39.37 -45 42 12.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 296.1 +/- 51.7
  Background counts = 1388.6
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Thu Mar  8 18:38:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.43'
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.14"
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.923
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 0, mean size = 9.14"
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Warning, spatial fit 85 centroid is now closest to src. 97
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source is confused with source 97
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.14"
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.923
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 1, mean size = 9.14"
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:44 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 16611.000000, observed total counts = 16445.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 98 = 0.901103 pixels
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 66 to 64
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] 16610.807100 total counts/ 16560.300000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.392481
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 98 = 0.901103 pixels
  Position = (313.8, 224.2) = 8 48 39.36 -45 42 13.1
  Extent = 2.3" x 2.3", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 50.5 +/- 128.9
  Background counts = 16560.3
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability