[Thu Mar  8 18:38:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (405.6, 259.1) = 8 48 1.28 -45 39 35.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 167.4 +/- 34.9
  Background counts = 561.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Thu Mar  8 18:38:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.27'
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.57"
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.874
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 0, mean size = 10.57"
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.csv
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.csv
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source 88 is offset by -4.717914 and -4.089199 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.198726 x 1.198726, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source 88 is offset by 0.203782 and -1.361801 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.214400 x 1.214400, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9