[Thu Mar  8 18:38:57 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.5, 198.0) = 8 48 16.19 -45 44 5.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 334.5 +/- 44.1
  Background counts = 811.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Thu Mar  8 18:38:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.92'
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.89"
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.998
[Thu Mar  8 18:54:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 10.89"
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:37 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source 108 is offset by -0.057033 and -1.898705 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.214271 x 1.214271, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Warning, spatial fit 95 centroid is now closest to src. 110
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Warning: source 97 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 108 at 12.265071 pixels away
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8730.620000, observed total counts = 8078.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 108 = 1.274742 pixels
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 95 to 99
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] 8682.408000 total counts/ 7978.530000 bgd. counts: snr = 7.880177
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 108 = 1.274742 pixels
  Position = (370.1, 196.9) = 8 48 15.96 -45 44 11.8
  Extent = 24.2 (24.2-48.4)" x 12.4 (7.0-17.7)", rotation angle = 50 (34-63) degrees
  Source counts = 703.9 +/- 93.2
  Background counts = 7978.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.37
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:55 2012] Source is confused with source 19
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 18.30"
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] source mask rpix=4.2, npix_max = 88, mask sum = 100, frac = 1.129
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 1, mean size = 18.30"
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.csv
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:44 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src76 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 76 centroid is now closest to src. 101
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8732.940000, observed total counts = 8078.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 108 = 1.505776 pixels
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 76 to 79
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:25 2012] 8143.516100 total counts/ 8043.870000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.111035
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 108 = 1.505776 pixels
  Position = (369.7, 198.3) = 8 48 16.12 -45 44 5.5
  Extent = 3.3 (2.8-6.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 99.6 +/- 90.2
  Background counts = 8043.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability