[Thu Mar  8 18:40:56 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (366.0, 199.0) = 8 48 17.64 -45 43 59.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 125.4 +/- 23.1
  Background counts = 183.0
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Thu Mar  8 18:40:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.72'
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.79"
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.014
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 52 for pass 0, mean size = 10.79"
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:29 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.csv
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src52.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 02:13:31 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src52 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Warning: source 52 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 74 at 14.706041 pixels away
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Source 74 is offset by -3.864853 and -6.881470 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.238198 x 1.238198, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:27 2012] Source is confused with source 73
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.79"
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.014
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 48 for pass 1, mean size = 10.79"
[Sun Mar 11 16:11:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:11:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:11:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src48 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 16:11:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:11:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 16:11:55 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src48 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Warning: source 48 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 74 at 14.706041 pixels away
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 16:13:08 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9