[Thu Mar  8 18:39:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.2, 220.2) = 8 48 36.28 -45 42 29.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 118.9 +/- 26.4
  Background counts = 281.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Thu Mar  8 18:39:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.91'
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.38"
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.885
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 9.38"
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source 63 is offset by -5.582461 and -5.679843 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.305237 x 1.305237, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source is confused with source 61
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.38 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.38"
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.885
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 9.38"
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 63 centroid is now closest to src. 61
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9