[Thu Mar  8 18:39:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (374.1, 180.7) = 8 48 14.29 -45 45 24.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 125.2 +/- 23.3
  Background counts = 171.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Thu Mar  8 18:39:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.15'
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.50"
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.910
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 0, mean size = 11.50"
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72 appears to have run properly
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Warning: source 72 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 12.892390 pixels away
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source is confused with source 75
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.50"
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.910
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 64 for pass 1, mean size = 11.50"
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.csv
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src64.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src64 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3844.590000, observed total counts = 3842.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 58 = 0.489780 pixels
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] 3785.672800 total counts/ 3714.910000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.160996
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 58 = 0.489780 pixels
  Position = (373.6, 180.5) = 8 48 14.49 -45 45 22.8
  Extent = 7.4 (3.0-23.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 70.8 +/- 61.5
  Background counts = 3714.9
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability