[Thu Mar  8 18:39:52 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (489.0, 279.9) = 8 47 26.68 -45 38 7.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 121.8 +/- 17.8
  Background counts = 71.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Mar  8 18:39:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.88'
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.37"
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 62, frac = 1.214
[Fri Mar  9 12:30:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 74 for pass 0, mean size = 13.37"
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:35:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Fri Mar  9 20:36:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source 13 is offset by 3.252682 and 7.863665 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.200396 x 3.200396, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 02:14:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.37 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.37"
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 62, frac = 1.214
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 1, mean size = 13.37"
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Sun Mar 11 07:03:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412990201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 955.191000, observed total counts = 795.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 16:12:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9