[Wed May 15 01:32:42 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (318.1, 360.2) = 18 56 23.37 -37 50 28.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.3 +/- 11.3
  Background counts = 33.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Wed May 15 01:32:44 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.70'
[Wed May 15 02:42:36 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 15 02:42:36 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78"
[Wed May 15 02:42:36 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.789
[Wed May 15 02:42:36 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 8.78"
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Wed May 15 04:25:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Warning: source 23 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 10.342898 pixels away
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 15 04:25:21 2013] Source is confused with source 15
[Wed May 15 04:54:23 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 15 04:54:23 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78"
[Wed May 15 04:54:23 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.789
[Wed May 15 04:54:23 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 8.78"
[Wed May 15 06:35:09 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 06:35:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Wed May 15 06:35:09 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 06:35:09 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Wed May 15 06:35:09 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 15 06:35:10 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 06:35:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Wed May 15 06:35:10 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 15 06:35:10 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Wed May 15 06:35:10 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412602201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 15
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 15 06:35:19 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9