[Sun Feb 19 03:41:30 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (285.8, 308.6) = 18 56 33.89 -37 52 32.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 178.4 +/- 36.0 Background counts = 550.3 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008 [Sun Feb 19 03:41:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.18' [Sun Feb 19 03:56:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Feb 19 03:56:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.02" [Sun Feb 19 03:56:17 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.120 [Sun Feb 19 03:56:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.02" [Sun Feb 19 04:20:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 04:20:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 04:20:52 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3 appears to have run properly [Sun Feb 19 04:20:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 04:20:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 04:20:52 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly [Sun Feb 19 05:39:51 2012] Source 3 is offset by -1.090448 and -7.190954 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.673789 x 2.673789, not incorporating fit results [Sun Feb 19 05:39:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Feb 19 05:39:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Feb 19 05:39:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Feb 19 05:39:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Feb 19 05:39:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Feb 19 05:40:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Feb 19 05:40:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.02" [Sun Feb 19 05:40:03 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.120 [Sun Feb 19 05:40:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.02" [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Sun Feb 19 06:03:21 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412600401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3 appears to have run properly [Sun Feb 19 06:55:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6564.710000, observed total counts = 6567.000000 [Sun Feb 19 06:55:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.151647 pixels [Sun Feb 19 06:55:31 2012] 6512.135000 total counts/ 6396.030000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.451763 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 3 = 0.151647 pixels Position = (285.6, 308.5) = 18 56 33.94 -37 52 33.1 Extent = 7.0 (1.8-14.0)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 116.1 +/- 80.7 Background counts = 6396.0 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability