[Fri Mar 30 12:07:11 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (157.8, 373.0) = 18 57 20.93 -37 47 52.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 75.0 +/- 17.7 Background counts = 89.8 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003 [Fri Mar 30 12:07:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.54' [Fri Mar 30 13:53:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Mar 30 13:53:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.20" [Fri Mar 30 13:53:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.961 [Fri Mar 30 13:53:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 80 for pass 0, mean size = 12.20" [Fri Mar 30 23:00:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80.ximg exists [Fri Mar 30 23:00:27 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 30 23:00:27 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src80 appears to have run properly [Fri Mar 30 23:00:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80.ximg exists [Fri Mar 30 23:00:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 30 23:00:30 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src80 appears to have run properly [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Source 35 is offset by 4.143621 and 3.540391 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.558469 x 1.558469, not incorporating fit results [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = -2.822850, observed total counts = 609.000000 [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 35 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 80 centroid is now closest to src. 49 [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Mar 30 23:01:11 2012] Source is confused with source 31 [Fri Mar 30 23:51:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Mar 30 23:51:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.20" [Fri Mar 30 23:51:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.961 [Fri Mar 30 23:51:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 1, mean size = 12.20" [Sat Mar 31 07:19:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68.ximg exists [Sat Mar 31 07:19:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68_1.ximg exists [Sat Mar 31 07:19:55 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src68 appears to have run properly [Sat Mar 31 07:19:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists [Sat Mar 31 07:19:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists [Sat Mar 31 07:19:57 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412600201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src68 appears to have run properly [Sat Mar 31 07:20:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 613.503000, observed total counts = 616.000000 [Sat Mar 31 07:20:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 35 = 4.120966 pixels [Sat Mar 31 07:20:31 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 68 to 37 [Sat Mar 31 07:20:31 2012] 605.666000 total counts/ 593.750000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.489022 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 35 = 4.120966 pixels Position = (155.4, 369.7) = 18 57 21.81 -37 48 6.6 Extent = 10.2 (3.4-23.5)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 11.9 +/- 24.6 Background counts = 593.8 Rate = 0.0002 +/- 0.0004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability