[Tue Mar 20 10:14:27 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (279.4, 362.7) = 5 34 33.50 22 6 43.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 336.3 +/- 27.2 Background counts = 278.9 Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.006 [Tue Mar 20 10:14:29 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.86' [Tue Mar 20 16:43:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 20 16:43:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86" [Tue Mar 20 16:43:08 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.777 [Tue Mar 20 16:43:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 8.86" [Tue Mar 20 22:50:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 22:50:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Mar 20 22:50:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 22:50:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Mar 20 22:50:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 20 22:50:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 22:50:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Tue Mar 20 22:50:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 20 22:50:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv [Tue Mar 20 22:50:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5054.730000, observed total counts = 2950.000000 [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 28 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Source 28 is offset by 1.081307 and 1.153261 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.033554 x 1.033554, not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Source is confused with source 24 [Tue Mar 20 22:50:53 2012] Source is confused with source 25 [Wed Mar 21 04:07:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 21 04:07:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86" [Wed Mar 21 04:07:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.777 [Wed Mar 21 04:07:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.86" [Wed Mar 21 09:27:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 09:27:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Wed Mar 21 09:27:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 09:27:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Wed Mar 21 09:27:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 21 09:27:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 09:27:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Wed Mar 21 09:27:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 09:27:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv [Wed Mar 21 09:27:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Source 28 is offset by -3.536571 and 8.786824 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.005375 x 1.005375, not incorporating fit results [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 24 [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Source 28 is offset by -1.850670 and 5.101514 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.432529 x 1.432529, not incorporating fit results [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 21 09:28:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 21 10:36:56 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24263.053680, 31510.213684, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 21 10:36:56 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_src.reg [Wed Mar 21 10:36:56 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (242, 325) - (317, 400) [Wed Mar 21 10:36:56 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24263.053680, 31510.213684, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25268.380524, 31441.382050, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25325.723846, 31791.484833, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25364.155396, 32370.403351, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26027.333923, 31472.135254, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24868.960571, 32395.023438, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23661.872742, 31559.127289, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23325.458000, 31331.720000, 1470.832042, 1470.832042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26003.322000, 33292.888000, 1488.376043, 1488.376043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26910.396667, 31598.989899, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25344.009033, 33359.717712, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26244.279022, 31963.554626, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21290.113831, 31642.800537, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23018.267090, 31883.271851, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 21 10:36:56 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28.gif [Wed Mar 21 10:41:28 2012] Mean detx,y = (-700.56, -7224.06) [Wed Mar 21 10:41:30 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Mar 21 10:41:44 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Mar 21 10:41:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 21 10:41:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Mar 21 11:55:09 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Wed Mar 21 11:55:09 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Wed Mar 21 13:17:21 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Wed Mar 21 13:17:21 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 21 13:17:25 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Wed Mar 21 13:17:25 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0771, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0412593201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src28.arf [Wed Mar 21 13:17:25 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Wed Mar 21 13:17:25 2012] Updating source flux to 1.3e-12 [Wed Mar 21 13:20:36 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting