[Wed Aug  1 10:14:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.8, 341.5) = 5 34 5.25 22 5 27.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 96.2 +/- 21.6
  Background counts = 212.1
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Wed Aug  1 10:14:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.04'
[Wed Aug  1 10:19:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug  1 10:19:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Wed Aug  1 10:19:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.875
[Wed Aug  1 10:19:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 9.45"
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Wed Aug  1 15:33:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Source 23 is offset by -4.946867 and -7.860396 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.086083 x 1.272000, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3115.740000, observed total counts = 2256.000000
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug  1 23:22:52 2012] Source is confused with source 24
[Wed Aug  1 23:23:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug  1 23:23:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.45"
[Wed Aug  1 23:23:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.875
[Wed Aug  1 23:23:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 9.45"
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Aug  2 03:24:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412593001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Warning, spatial fit 14 centroid is now closest to src. 22
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Source 23 is offset by -6.498270 and -4.088304 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.005389 x 3.005389, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 10.968541 pixels away
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  2 11:32:55 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9