[Sat May 5 10:32:58 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (332.8, 359.8) = 5 34 16.90 22 6 24.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 360.2 +/- 36.0 Background counts = 524.0 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Sat May 5 10:33:27 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.10' [Sat May 5 21:59:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 5 21:59:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.98" [Sat May 5 21:59:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.761 [Sat May 5 21:59:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 8.98" [Sun May 6 14:30:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:30:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Sun May 6 14:30:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:30:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Sun May 6 14:30:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 6 14:30:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:30:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv [Sun May 6 14:30:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists [Sun May 6 14:30:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv [Sun May 6 14:30:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 59 [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6315.590000, observed total counts = 5325.000000 [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun May 6 14:31:28 2012] Source is confused with source 72 [Mon May 7 01:40:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 7 01:40:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.98" [Mon May 7 01:40:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.761 [Mon May 7 01:40:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 1, mean size = 8.98" [Mon May 7 21:58:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.ximg exists [Mon May 7 21:58:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.csv [Mon May 7 21:58:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89_1.ximg exists [Mon May 7 21:58:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.csv [Mon May 7 21:58:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 7 21:59:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists [Mon May 7 21:59:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.csv [Mon May 7 21:59:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists [Mon May 7 21:59:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.csv [Mon May 7 21:59:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 72 [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6310.310000, observed total counts = 5325.000000 [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 7 22:00:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue May 8 05:39:34 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28903.896210, 31251.244781, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 8 05:39:34 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg [Tue May 8 05:39:34 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (295, 322) - (370, 397) [Tue May 8 05:39:34 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28903.896210, 31251.244781, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23869.124000, 34083.068000, 3013.136087, 3013.136087, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26419.218903, 32309.342987, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26461.203400, 31675.520000, 1456.152042, 1456.152042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28427.220215, 31326.567963, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27145.068000, 31664.856000, 1462.176042, 1462.176042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32504.386000, 28004.047200, 1506.568043, 454.138413, -0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27437.159790, 32223.041260, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25836.542000, 33005.166200, 1502.352043, 697.861620, 353.317000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27820.007050, 32134.493378, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32984.986000, 28475.868000, 1960.704056, 1960.704056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27759.998000, 33044.646000, 996.600029, 996.600029, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29396.112091, 31439.021729, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29956.002014, 31246.866638, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27864.390000, 33448.038000, 1984.856057, 1984.856057, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26812.107483, 33268.435150, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28880.431061, 31652.087830, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue May 8 05:39:34 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif [Tue May 8 08:28:30 2012] Mean detx,y = (3859.38, -7241.93) [Tue May 8 08:28:34 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue May 8 08:29:09 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue May 8 08:29:09 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 8 08:29:09 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz [Tue May 8 14:49:38 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue May 8 14:49:38 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue May 8 15:47:26 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue May 8 15:47:26 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue May 8 15:47:36 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue May 8 15:47:36 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0227, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0412592101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf [Tue May 8 15:47:36 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue May 8 15:47:36 2012] Updating source flux to 4.4e-13 [Tue May 8 15:59:15 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting