[Thu May  3 05:48:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (297.6, 383.6) = 5 34 27.94 22 8 21.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 93.4 +/- 21.8
  Background counts = 175.5
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.005

[Thu May  3 05:48:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.18'
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.52"
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.865
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 74 for pass 0, mean size = 9.52"
[Thu May  3 23:11:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:39 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src74 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 23:11:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Thu May  3 23:11:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.csv
[Thu May  3 23:11:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 23:12:37 2012] Source 28 is offset by -4.761487 and 7.055208 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.059940 x 1.059940, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Warning, spatial fit 74 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Source is confused with source 30
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.52"
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.865
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 1, mean size = 9.52"
[Fri May  4 18:52:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:52:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Fri May  4 18:52:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:52:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.csv
[Fri May  4 18:52:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 18:53:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:53:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Fri May  4 18:53:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:53:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Fri May  4 18:53:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 8026.000000, observed total counts = 7683.000000
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.967125 pixels
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 69 to 34
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] 7639.222500 total counts/ 7543.330000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.104086
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.967125 pixels
  Position = (297.5, 382.7) = 5 34 27.98 22 8 24.1
  Extent = 35.6 (16.2-71.3)", rotation angle = 146 (138-156) degrees
  Source counts = 95.9 +/- 87.4
  Background counts = 7543.3
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.01
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability