[Thu May  3 05:48:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (277.8, 169.9) = 5 34 34.13 21 52 54.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 285.9 +/- 27.7
  Background counts = 116.8
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.005

[Thu May  3 05:48:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.44'
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.15"
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.799
[Thu May  3 12:28:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 11.15"
[Thu May  3 23:11:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Thu May  3 23:11:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Thu May  3 23:11:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  3 23:11:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  3 23:11:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly
[Thu May  3 23:12:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 84
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  3 23:12:38 2012] Source is confused with source 12
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.15"
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.799
[Fri May  4 06:29:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 11.15"
[Fri May  4 18:52:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:52:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Fri May  4 18:52:55 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:52:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Fri May  4 18:52:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  4 18:52:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:52:58 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  4 18:52:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2290.550000, observed total counts = 2354.000000
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 3.500516 pixels
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] 2052.578000 total counts/ 1908.660000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.294207
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 3.500516 pixels
  Position = (274.5, 168.6) = 5 34 35.15 21 52 52.8
  Extent = 9.1 (6.2-11.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 143.9 +/- 45.3
  Background counts = 1908.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.008
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2224.690000, observed total counts = 2235.000000
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 1.394446 pixels
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 23 to 62
[Fri May  4 18:53:55 2012] 2201.880700 total counts/ 2170.370000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.676381
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 1.394446 pixels
  Position = (275.1, 169.8) = 5 34 34.96 21 52 58.3
  Extent = 5.9 (2.7-12.8)" x 5.0 (2.7-10.5)", rotation angle = 90 (90-92) degrees
  Source counts = 31.5 +/- 46.9
  Background counts = 2170.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.008
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability