[Wed Dec 21 22:44:31 2011] Detection parameters: Position = (394.1, 355.2) = 5 34 6.64 22 3 31.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 443.1 +/- 35.5 Background counts = 364.0 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Wed Dec 21 22:44:34 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.07' [Thu Dec 22 17:52:01 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Dec 22 17:52:01 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.46" [Thu Dec 22 17:52:01 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.593 [Thu Dec 22 17:52:01 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 10.46" [Fri Dec 23 21:48:56 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists [Fri Dec 23 21:48:56 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv [Fri Dec 23 21:48:56 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 23 21:48:56 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv [Fri Dec 23 21:48:56 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Dec 23 21:48:59 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists [Fri Dec 23 21:48:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv [Fri Dec 23 21:48:59 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists [Fri Dec 23 21:48:59 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv [Fri Dec 23 21:48:59 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Dec 23 21:50:15 2011] Source 67 is offset by 1.181040 and -1.207280 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.188253 x 1.188253, not incorporating fit results [Fri Dec 23 21:50:15 2011] Warning, spatial fit 90 centroid is now closest to src. 61 [Fri Dec 23 21:50:16 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Dec 23 21:50:16 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Dec 23 21:50:16 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Dec 23 21:50:16 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Dec 23 21:50:16 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Dec 23 21:50:16 2011] Source is confused with source 63 [Sun Dec 25 02:57:50 2011] Using EEF radius (= 10.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Dec 25 02:57:50 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.46" [Sun Dec 25 02:57:50 2011] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.593 [Sun Dec 25 02:57:50 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 10.46" [Mon Dec 26 10:48:11 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 10:48:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv [Mon Dec 26 10:48:11 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 10:48:11 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv [Mon Dec 26 10:48:11 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Dec 26 10:48:16 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 10:48:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv [Mon Dec 26 10:48:16 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists [Mon Dec 26 10:48:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv [Mon Dec 26 10:48:16 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Dec 26 10:50:14 2011] Warning, spatial fit 81 centroid is now closest to src. 61 [Mon Dec 26 10:50:14 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Dec 26 10:50:14 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Dec 26 10:50:14 2011] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Dec 26 10:50:14 2011] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Dec 26 10:50:14 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Dec 27 03:26:12 2011] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34240.746704, 30851.102661, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Dec 27 03:26:12 2011] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src67_src.reg [Tue Dec 27 03:26:12 2011] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (357, 318) - (432, 393) [Tue Dec 27 03:26:12 2011] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34240.746704, 30851.102661, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31179.860000, 34196.614000, 1724.416050, 449.452813, 3.901000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34364.306458, 31441.820129, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35705.874176, 29369.243195, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34331.745178, 30061.709351, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34329.135284, 29347.856934, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34354.758972, 32146.815369, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35035.692000, 30824.822000, 1729.760050, 346.068010, 358.363000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35421.974000, 29894.304000, 1222.264035, 1222.264035, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34990.848236, 31972.127716, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35420.525200, 27214.815400, 1494.912043, 804.768023, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35753.144318, 30755.351685, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34922.008200, 32413.492000, 1755.952051, 1755.952051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35127.425598, 31188.312622, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31993.084400, 34134.452200, 1709.640049, 1709.640049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35891.333282, 32123.820160, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35274.739899, 32859.019012, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35909.363586, 28061.792603, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35665.284088, 28818.847656, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Tue Dec 27 03:26:12 2011] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src67.gif [Tue Dec 27 09:11:16 2011] Mean detx,y = (-7006.29, 3751.57) [Tue Dec 27 09:11:20 2011] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Tue Dec 27 09:11:44 2011] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Tue Dec 27 09:11:45 2011] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src67_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Dec 27 09:11:45 2011] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src67_bgd.pi.gz [Tue Dec 27 19:23:28 2011] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Tue Dec 27 19:23:28 2011] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Tue Dec 27 20:55:21 2011] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Tue Dec 27 20:55:21 2011] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src67_src_b10.pi.gz [Tue Dec 27 20:55:32 2011] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Tue Dec 27 20:55:32 2011] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0218, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src67.arf [Tue Dec 27 20:55:32 2011] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Tue Dec 27 20:55:32 2011] Updating source flux to 4.4e-13 [Tue Dec 27 21:06:12 2011] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting