[Wed Feb 15 10:14:08 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (391.4, 276.9) = 5 34 7.41 21 57 58.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 314.1 +/- 25.8
  Background counts = 178.2
  Rate = 0.06 +/- 0.005

[Wed Feb 15 10:14:10 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.92'
[Wed Feb 15 10:17:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Feb 15 10:17:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.89"
[Wed Feb 15 10:17:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.813
[Wed Feb 15 10:17:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 9.89"
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:41 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:41 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb 15 18:03:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 41
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:17 2012] Source is confused with source 40
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.89"
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.813
[Thu Feb 16 00:44:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 9.89"
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Feb 16 09:35:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Feb 16 19:06:52 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 98
[Thu Feb 16 19:06:52 2012] Source 28 is offset by -7.475709 and -1.042634 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.115623 x 1.115623, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Feb 16 19:06:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1890.310000, observed total counts = 2063.000000
[Thu Feb 16 19:06:52 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 4.916485 pixels
[Thu Feb 16 19:06:52 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 23 to 44
[Thu Feb 16 19:06:52 2012] 1327.330035 total counts/ 1327.330000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000001
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 4.916485 pixels
  Position = (395.4, 273.9) = 5 34 6.19 21 57 45.1
  Extent = 19.4 (2.4-36.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 36.4
  Background counts = 1327.3
  Rate = 4e-09 +/- 0.004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability