[Wed Mar 28 00:31:48 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (393.9, 336.0) = 5 34 6.74 22 2 15.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 677.7 +/- 43.6
  Background counts = 499.0
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.003

[Wed Mar 28 00:31:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.44'
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.15"
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.935
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 0, mean size = 10.15"
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:25 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5662.710000, observed total counts = 5053.000000
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:25 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source 92 is offset by 5.237416 and 3.823765 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.302993 x 1.302993, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 94
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source is confused with source 85
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.15"
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.935
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 10.15"
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 6180.420000, observed total counts = 5504.000000
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:43 2012] Source 92 is offset by -1.239113 and -4.144051 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.230543 x 1.230543, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:25 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34222.241150, 29184.511566, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:25 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src.reg
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:25 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (356, 299) - (431, 374)
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:25 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34222.241150, 29184.511566, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34594.610000, 30011.498000, 1675.880048, 492.396814, 357.935840, X, Y) && !ellipse(35595.087769, 30914.557861, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34314.745026, 32125.545929, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34162.752563, 26654.589905, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34243.988495, 30378.472931, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34242.552000, 30965.696000, 1727.024050, 1727.024050, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34126.899400, 31185.820572, 1650.528047, 1650.528047, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35277.228000, 30366.250000, 1754.856050, 245.900807, 1.338000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34964.980286, 29434.610016, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34816.439362, 31441.392670, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35395.016000, 29069.870000, 1022.176029, 1022.176029, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35271.806091, 27098.213440, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35455.032318, 31619.961975, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35598.305664, 28476.478973, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35569.121582, 30136.798889, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35502.687439, 26485.631805, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:25 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92.gif
[Sat Mar 31 04:13:38 2012] Mean detx,y = (-7040.30, 2072.14) 
[Sat Mar 31 04:13:40 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Mar 31 04:13:59 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Mar 31 04:14:00 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 04:14:00 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 08:28:40 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Mar 31 08:28:40 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:50 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:50 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:59 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:59 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0467, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92.arf
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:59 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:59 2012] Updating source flux to 8.2e-13
[Sat Mar 31 11:37:36 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting