[Wed Mar 28 00:31:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (391.1, 277.0) = 5 34 7.63 21 57 58.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 534.8 +/- 45.9
  Background counts = 742.0
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.003

[Wed Mar 28 00:31:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.90'
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88"
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.977
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 0, mean size = 9.88"
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source 110 is offset by 3.179827 and -5.943839 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.129821 x 1.129821, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 10757.000000, observed total counts = 7566.000000
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 110
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 29 00:25:26 2012] Source is confused with source 111
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88"
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.977
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 1, mean size = 9.88"
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:10 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 10809.300000, observed total counts = 7566.000000
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 110
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:28 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33979.104187, 24052.162048, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:28 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src110_src.reg
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:28 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (354, 240) - (429, 315)
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:28 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33979.104187, 24052.162048, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34509.637451, 25007.184052, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34162.752563, 26654.589905, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34047.272064, 25879.055847, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34011.434000, 25391.690000, 1604.064046, 1604.064046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33876.097015, 22571.377869, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34374.950470, 23620.557831, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34652.002777, 24399.713348, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33893.333466, 21529.404984, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34974.732000, 25231.754000, 741.628021, 741.628021, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34578.623077, 22320.318298, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34369.435974, 21261.420929, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35502.687439, 26485.631805, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34529.627167, 21805.449707, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 31 03:06:28 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src110.gif
[Sat Mar 31 05:09:54 2012] Mean detx,y = (-7059.52, -3044.20) 
[Sat Mar 31 05:09:56 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Mar 31 05:10:17 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Mar 31 05:10:17 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src110_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 05:10:17 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src110_bgd.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 09:35:15 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sat Mar 31 09:35:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:51 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat Mar 31 11:26:51 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src110_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 31 11:27:01 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat Mar 31 11:27:01 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.034, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src110.arf
[Sat Mar 31 11:27:01 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat Mar 31 11:27:01 2012] Updating source flux to 5.9e-13
[Sat Mar 31 11:37:36 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting