[Wed Mar 28 00:29:47 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (389.1, 210.8) = 5 34 8.27 21 53 11.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 143.6 +/- 26.0
  Background counts = 296.5
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Wed Mar 28 00:29:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.14'
[Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.00"
[Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.981
[Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 11.00"
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Wed Mar 28 10:34:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 93
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.00"
[Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.981
[Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 47 for pass 1, mean size = 11.00"
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.csv
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.csv
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.csv
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.csv
[Thu Mar 29 11:04:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 47 centroid is now closest to src. 93
[Fri Mar 30 21:00:59 2012] Source 62 is offset by -8.744423 and -1.290992 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.233398 x 1.233398, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9