[Wed Mar 28 00:29:45 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (392.9, 328.1) = 5 34 7.05 22 1 40.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 937.7 +/- 67.4 Background counts = 737.6 Rate = 0.06 +/- 0.004 [Wed Mar 28 00:29:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.18' [Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02" [Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.764 [Wed Mar 28 00:39:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 10.02" [Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv [Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv [Wed Mar 28 10:34:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 28 10:34:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 10:34:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv [Wed Mar 28 10:34:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 28 10:34:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv [Wed Mar 28 10:34:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 29 00:24:53 2012] Source 30 is offset by 5.880884 and -1.887703 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.065191 x 2.065191, not incorporating fit results [Thu Mar 29 00:24:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 39 [Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Mar 29 00:24:54 2012] Source is confused with source 29 [Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02" [Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.764 [Thu Mar 29 00:26:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 10.02" [Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists [Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv [Thu Mar 29 11:04:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Mar 29 11:04:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Thu Mar 29 11:04:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Thu Mar 29 11:04:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Thu Mar 29 11:04:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv [Thu Mar 29 11:04:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Mar 30 21:00:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 24 [Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Mar 30 21:01:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Mar 30 21:02:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(34136.812927, 28496.213806, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Mar 30 21:02:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30_src.reg [Fri Mar 30 21:02:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (355, 291) - (430, 366) [Fri Mar 30 21:02:38 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(34136.812927, 28496.213806, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35670.298000, 26570.053000, 772.908022, 772.908022, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35708.266000, 27599.104000, 1462.336042, 1462.336042, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34740.934000, 26651.992000, 998.000029, 998.000029, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34273.026000, 26451.744000, 1631.408047, 1631.408047, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34355.093506, 25788.041443, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34048.480103, 27780.845367, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34787.605743, 25812.627014, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34093.936859, 29090.550079, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34242.857452, 31083.765533, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35194.656250, 28392.250824, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34286.564545, 29614.143097, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34285.144104, 30222.370483, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35412.764252, 26231.133972, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(34915.814453, 30576.373505, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36028.308000, 30201.654000, 1089.752031, 1089.752031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35500.956000, 29795.210000, 838.432024, 838.432024, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35148.904785, 26782.418945, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(36134.533966, 26074.997009, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Fri Mar 30 21:02:38 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30.gif [Fri Mar 30 21:55:34 2012] Mean detx,y = (1587.69, 6862.38) [Fri Mar 30 21:55:36 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Fri Mar 30 21:55:54 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Fri Mar 30 21:55:54 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30_src_b10.pi.gz [Fri Mar 30 21:55:54 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30_bgd.pi.gz [Sat Mar 31 00:35:52 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat Mar 31 00:35:52 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat Mar 31 11:26:32 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat Mar 31 11:26:32 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Mar 31 11:26:41 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat Mar 31 11:26:41 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0591, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0412591401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src30.arf [Sat Mar 31 11:26:41 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat Mar 31 11:26:41 2012] Updating source flux to 1e-12 [Sat Mar 31 11:27:12 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting