[Mon Feb 20 09:43:54 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (271.9, 130.1) = 5 34 35.89 21 50 1.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 413.6 +/- 32.7 Background counts = 130.3 Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002 [Mon Feb 20 09:43:56 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.36' [Mon Feb 20 19:05:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Feb 20 19:05:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.61" [Mon Feb 20 19:05:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.909 [Mon Feb 20 19:05:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 12.61" [Tue Feb 21 07:26:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists [Tue Feb 21 07:26:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv [Tue Feb 21 07:26:33 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists [Tue Feb 21 07:26:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv [Tue Feb 21 07:26:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Feb 21 07:26:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists [Tue Feb 21 07:26:36 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv [Tue Feb 21 07:26:36 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists [Tue Feb 21 07:26:36 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.csv [Tue Feb 21 07:26:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4830.310000, observed total counts = 4834.000000 [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 2.984935 pixels [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 61 to 54 [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] 4554.580000 total counts/ 3438.840000 bgd. counts: snr = 19.026417 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 2.984935 pixels Position = (269.7, 132.1) = 5 34 36.57 21 50 12.4 Extent = 24.3 (24.0-24.4)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 1115.7 +/- 67.5 Background counts = 3438.8 Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.005 [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Feb 21 07:27:20 2012] Source is confused with source 2 [Tue Feb 21 22:13:39 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Feb 21 22:13:39 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Tue Feb 21 22:13:39 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 24.30" [Tue Feb 21 22:13:39 2012] source mask rpix=5.6, npix_max = 148, mask sum = 143, frac = 0.965 [Tue Feb 21 22:13:39 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 24.30" [Wed Feb 22 17:00:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists [Wed Feb 22 17:00:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv [Wed Feb 22 17:00:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists [Wed Feb 22 17:00:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv [Wed Feb 22 17:00:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Feb 22 17:00:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists [Wed Feb 22 17:00:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists [Wed Feb 22 17:00:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly [Wed Feb 22 17:01:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4807.020000, observed total counts = 4804.000000 [Wed Feb 22 17:01:43 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 1.333607 pixels [Wed Feb 22 17:01:43 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 57 to 41 [Wed Feb 22 17:01:43 2012] 4453.262200 total counts/ 4402.300000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.768083 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 24 = 1.333607 pixels Position = (270.6, 131.1) = 5 34 36.29 21 50 8.2 Extent = 5.3 (3.9-7.1)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 51.0 +/- 66.7 Background counts = 4402.3 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.005 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability