[Mon Apr 30 19:48:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (296.1, 397.6) = 5 34 28.31 22 9 27.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 78.6 +/- 19.0
  Background counts = 130.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.005

[Mon Apr 30 19:48:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.19'
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02"
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.954
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 10.02"
[Tue May  1 09:55:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  1 09:55:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  1 09:56:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 84 centroid is now closest to src. 85
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.02"
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.954
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 1, mean size = 10.02"
[Wed May  2 01:43:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 01:43:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Warning: source 75 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 89 at 13.367000 pixels away
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0