[Mon Apr 30 19:48:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (312.2, 362.9) = 5 34 23.27 22 6 58.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 160.9 +/- 24.6
  Background counts = 195.7
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006

[Mon Apr 30 19:48:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.78'
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.82"
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.979
[Mon Apr 30 23:12:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 8.82"
[Tue May  1 09:55:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  1 09:55:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Tue May  1 09:55:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Tue May  1 09:55:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May  1 09:56:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May  1 09:56:47 2012] Source is confused with source 13
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.82 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.82"
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.979
[Tue May  1 14:49:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 1, mean size = 8.82"
[Wed May  2 01:43:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 01:43:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:24 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Wed May  2 01:43:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.csv
[Wed May  2 01:43:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412591101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May  2 01:44:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 66
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2975.720000, observed total counts = 2742.000000
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 65 = 0.764045 pixels
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 49 to 66
[Wed May  2 01:44:07 2012] 2905.518700 total counts/ 2880.890000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.458858
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 65 = 0.764045 pixels
  Position = (312.5, 363.6) = 5 34 23.17 22 6 59.1
  Extent = 2.2" x 2.2", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 24.6 +/- 53.9
  Background counts = 2880.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability