[Sat Nov 26 22:29:34 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (390.2, 295.1) = 5 34 7.85 21 59 14.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 282.6 +/- 25.7
  Background counts = 186.4
  Rate = 0.08 +/- 0.007

[Sat Nov 26 22:29:35 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.65'
[Sun Nov 27 09:34:36 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Nov 27 09:34:36 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.76"
[Sun Nov 27 09:34:36 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.598
[Sun Nov 27 09:34:36 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 9.76"
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:35 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:35 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:35 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:38 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:38 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sun Nov 27 22:37:38 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:55 2011] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 89
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:55 2011] Source 90 is offset by -6.779723 and -2.118074 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.159816 x 1.159816, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:56 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:56 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:56 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:56 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Nov 27 22:38:56 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Nov 28 13:20:41 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Nov 28 13:20:41 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.76"
[Mon Nov 28 13:20:41 2011] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.598
[Mon Nov 28 13:20:41 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 9.76"
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:43 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:43 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:43 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:43 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:46 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:46 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:46 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:46 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Nov 29 05:35:46 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412590601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Nov 29 05:36:53 2011] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 88
[Tue Nov 29 05:36:53 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 5644.750000, observed total counts = 5715.000000
[Tue Nov 29 05:36:53 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 90 = 4.021071 pixels
[Tue Nov 29 05:36:53 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 10 to 41
[Tue Nov 29 05:36:53 2011] 4451.180117 total counts/ 4451.180000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000002
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 90 = 4.021071 pixels
  Position = (386.3, 294.1) = 5 34 9.07 21 59 9.3
  Extent = 41.1 (5.1-77.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 66.7
  Background counts = 4451.2
  Rate = 2e-08 +/- 0.01
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability