[Mon Aug  6 19:53:48 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (121.9, 179.3) = 0 27 3.41 64 0 7.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 51.1 +/- 10.5
  Background counts = 19.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon Aug  6 19:53:49 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.44'
[Thu Aug  9 08:23:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 08:23:55 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Thu Aug  9 08:23:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.15"
[Thu Aug  9 08:23:55 2012] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 52, frac = 0.923
[Thu Aug  9 08:23:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 14.15"
[Sat Aug 11 03:21:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:21:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:21:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:21:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:21:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 03:22:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:22:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:22:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:22:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:22:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0412380401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:23 2012] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 40
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:23 2012] Warning, spatial fit 46 centroid is now closest to src. 47
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:23 2012] Warning, spatial fit 66 centroid is now closest to src. 64
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 47 centroid is now closest to src. 34
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 49 centroid is now closest to src. 46
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 53 centroid is now closest to src. 47
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 24
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 57 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 37
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning, spatial fit 87 centroid is now closest to src. 71
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Warning: source 92 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 81 at 18.957963 pixels away
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 12 18:07:42 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.6