[Sun May  6 08:20:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (352.5, 412.1) = 0 24 30.45 64 17 1.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 161.8 +/- 32.5
  Background counts = 457.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Sun May  6 08:20:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.13'
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.99 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.99"
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.146
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 0, mean size = 10.99"
[Sat May 12 17:35:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:34 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 17:35:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Sat May 12 17:35:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82.csv
[Sat May 12 17:35:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes