[Sun May  6 08:20:17 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (223.9, 280.9) = 0 25 56.13 64 7 31.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 55547.8 +/- 280.0
  Background counts = 409.5
  Rate = 2 +/- 0.01

[Sun May  6 08:20:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.55'
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.21"
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.059
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 9.21"
[Sat May 12 17:35:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat May 12 17:35:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sat May 12 17:35:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 17:35:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:35 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly