[Sun May  6 08:20:27 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (211.5, 282.4) = 0 26 4.35 64 7 33.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 685.4 +/- 42.0
  Background counts = 469.9
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.002

[Sun May  6 08:20:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.41'
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.63"
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.679
[Sun May  6 09:00:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 68 for pass 0, mean size = 9.63"
[Sat May 12 17:35:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:34 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src68 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 12 17:35:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Sat May 12 17:35:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 17:35:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.csv
[Sat May 12 17:35:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src68.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes