[Sat May 11 14:19:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (366.2, 434.4) = 0 24 21.24 64 18 46.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 371.7 +/- 27.0
  Background counts = 275.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0008

[Sat May 11 14:19:28 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.02'
[Sat May 11 14:36:33 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 11 14:36:33 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.94"
[Sat May 11 14:36:33 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.903
[Sat May 11 14:36:33 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 0, mean size = 11.94"
[Tue May 14 18:12:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 18:12:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Tue May 14 18:12:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 18:12:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.csv
[Tue May 14 18:12:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 18:12:03 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 18:12:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Tue May 14 18:12:03 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 18:12:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Tue May 14 18:12:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 6971.310000, observed total counts = 2698.000000
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 64
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = -6784.520000, observed total counts = 1812.000000
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 64
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 21 15:10:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 21 15:10:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 21 15:10:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.94"
[Tue May 21 15:10:59 2013] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.903
[Tue May 21 15:10:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 55 for pass 1, mean size = 11.94"
[Mon May 27 20:33:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:33:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.csv
[Mon May 27 20:33:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:33:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.csv
[Mon May 27 20:33:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src55.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 20:33:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:33:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55.csv
[Mon May 27 20:33:45 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:33:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55.csv
[Mon May 27 20:33:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src55.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 4371.460000, observed total counts = 2698.000000
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 64
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Source 64 is offset by -1.592469 and 0.761601 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.435375 x 1.435375, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 15:56:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 15:57:25 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(31811.931213, 37747.841278, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  2 15:57:25 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src.reg
[Sun Jun  2 15:57:25 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (329, 397) - (404, 472)
[Sun Jun  2 15:57:25 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(31811.931213, 37747.841278, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25910.573400, 28646.635000, 7268.208209, 5615.352162, 28.966000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30173.881683, 37649.392792, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29482.745697, 36871.100159, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30344.308014, 36224.210236, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28970.380798, 36351.277283, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29836.002655, 35849.710388, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31050.545807, 38555.291443, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  2 15:57:25 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64.gif
[Mon Jun  3 04:54:10 2013] Mean detx,y = (2635.34, 13975.90) 
[Mon Jun  3 04:54:17 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Mon Jun  3 04:55:00 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Mon Jun  3 04:55:01 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jun  3 04:55:01 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed Jun  5 10:09:25 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Wed Jun  5 10:09:25 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sat Jun 15 13:43:35 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sat Jun 15 13:43:35 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src_b10.pi.gz = 1836.00
[Sat Jun 15 13:43:36 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_bgd.pi.gz = 6385.00
[Sat Jun 15 13:43:36 2013] Got source and background scale factors 748455.000000, 1028890.000000
[Sat Jun 15 13:43:36 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (366.2, 434.4) = 0 24 21.24 64 18 46.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = -2808.7 +/- 43.9
  Background aperture counts = 4644.7
  Rate = -0.09 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jun 15 13:43:36 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Sat Jun 15 13:43:36 2013] Set source signif. to -2808.70/68.15 = -41.21
[Sat Jun 15 13:44:00 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sat Jun 15 13:44:00 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=-0.0882, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64.arf
[Sat Jun 15 13:44:00 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sat Jun 15 13:44:00 2013] Updated flux is not positive, keeping original flux
[Sat Jun 15 13:47:49 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sat Jun 15 13:48:17 2013] xmm0412380201/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete