[Sat Aug 18 08:37:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (344.0, 318.8) = 0 24 36.18 64 10 17.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 378.4 +/- 43.4
  Background counts = 752.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.62'
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.24"
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.873
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 8.24"
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 92 is offset by -2.111327 and 4.757783 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.989761 x 0.989761, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 92 is offset by 7.545110 and 5.799507 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.222727 x 4.222727, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.24"
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.873
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 8.24"