[Sat Aug 18 08:37:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.7, 344.8) = 0 24 51.00 64 12 7.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 260.3 +/- 41.0
  Background counts = 699.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.76'
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.31"
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.076
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 8.31"
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 87 is offset by -2.049649 and -1.910602 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.959297 x 0.959297, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 87 is offset by -1.360844 and 7.558699 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.479200 x 2.479200, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.31"
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.076
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 8.31"