[Sat Aug 18 08:37:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (240.4, 341.2) = 0 25 45.16 64 11 49.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 388.3 +/- 32.9
  Background counts = 503.0
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.23'
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.602
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 0, mean size = 9.04"
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src61 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Warning: source 61 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 69 at 12.613125 pixels away
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source is confused with source 68
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.602
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 1, mean size = 9.04"