[Sat Aug 18 08:37:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (295.5, 361.5) = 0 25 8.41 64 13 32.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 336.6 +/- 33.7
  Background counts = 595.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.57'
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.72"
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.758
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 0, mean size = 8.72"
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:05 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src54 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 82
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 60 is offset by 3.359739 and 3.657809 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.023458 x 1.023458, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Warning: source 76 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 60 at 11.510173 pixels away
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.72"
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.758
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 51 for pass 1, mean size = 8.72"