[Sat Aug 18 08:36:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (229.2, 287.6) = 0 25 52.53 64 8 1.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 17407.2 +/- 162.8
  Background counts = 482.6
  Rate = 0.9 +/- 0.008

[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.08'
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97"
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.914
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 8.97"
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 30
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 18 is offset by 9.281217 and -2.259310 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.111522 x 1.111522, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source is confused with source 15
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.97"
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.914
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 8.97"