[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (206.9, 260.2) = 0 26 7.27 64 6 1.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 167.0 +/- 32.1
  Background counts = 463.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat Aug 18 08:37:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.19'
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.03"
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.144
[Sat Aug 18 08:51:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 0, mean size = 10.03"
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Sun Aug 19 21:47:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3643.860000, observed total counts = 2848.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 100
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source 100 is offset by 8.311740 and 4.227607 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.080391 x 2.080391, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9