[Sat Aug 18 08:38:24 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.7, 257.0) = 0 25 4.29 64 5 46.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 8302.9 +/- 118.8
  Background counts = 332.6
  Rate = 0.3 +/- 0.004

[Sat Aug 18 08:38:25 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.02'
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.94"
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.925
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 7.94"
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:37 2012] Warning, spatial fit 33 centroid is now closest to src. 52
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 43237.800000, observed total counts = 44072.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 5.661442 pixels
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 33 to 43
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] 45190.000000 total counts/ 21229.500000 bgd. counts: snr = 164.447015
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 5.661442 pixels
  Position = (296.9, 260.0) = 0 25 7.48 64 5 59.9
  Extent = 15.3 (15.3-30.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 23960.5 +/- 212.6
  Background counts = 21229.5
  Rate = 0.8 +/- 0.007
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 41842.200000, observed total counts = 43192.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 4.297058 pixels
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 43 to 46
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] 37878.800000 total counts/ 25600.000000 bgd. counts: snr = 76.742500
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 54 = 4.297058 pixels
  Position = (299.6, 256.6) = 0 25 5.70 64 5 45.3
  Extent = 16.8 (16.7-33.5)" x 16.8 (16.7-33.5)", rotation angle = 0 (162-0) degrees
  Source counts = 12278.8 +/- 194.6
  Background counts = 25600.0
  Rate = 0.4 +/- 0.006
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.50
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source is confused with source 52
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source is confused with source 55