[Sat Aug 18 08:38:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (303.0, 304.1) = 0 25 3.47 64 9 11.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 10399.6 +/- 133.6
  Background counts = 456.7
  Rate = 0.3 +/- 0.004

[Sat Aug 18 08:38:25 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.52'
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.69"
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.963
[Thu Aug 23 17:35:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 6.69"
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28 appears to have run properly
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sun Aug 26 22:06:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0412380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:37 2012] Source 23 is offset by -6.453528 and 1.398683 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.427816 x 5.044977, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 22:07:38 2012] Source is confused with source 24