[Thu Mar 22 11:19:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (144.2, 326.2) = 21 59 36.79 -30 10 37.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 89.9 +/- 13.9
  Background counts = 30.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Thu Mar 22 11:19:50 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.36'
[Thu Mar 22 12:48:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 22 12:48:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.11"
[Thu Mar 22 12:48:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.881
[Thu Mar 22 12:48:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 12.11"
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:31 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 15.478770 pixels away
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 22 13:59:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 26 06:06:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 06:06:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.11"
[Mon Mar 26 06:06:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.881
[Mon Mar 26 06:06:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 12.11"
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0411780601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 15.478770 pixels away
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 26 08:45:38 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9