[Thu Jul 4 10:27:36 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (272.1, 328.3) = 11 4 35.75 38 13 7.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 54.7 +/- 12.1 Background counts = 18.5 Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.007 [Thu Jul 4 10:27:36 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.89' [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87" [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.703 [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 7.87" [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:27:49 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly [Thu Jul 4 10:27:56 2013] Source 8 is offset by -3.306205 and 2.938137 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.904846 x 0.904846, not incorporating fit results [Thu Jul 4 10:27:56 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jul 4 10:27:56 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jul 4 10:27:56 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jul 4 10:27:56 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jul 4 10:27:56 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jul 4 10:28:05 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jul 4 10:28:05 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87" [Thu Jul 4 10:28:05 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.703 [Thu Jul 4 10:28:05 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 7.87" [Thu Jul 4 10:28:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:28:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:28:06 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6 appears to have run properly [Thu Jul 4 10:28:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:28:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 4 10:28:06 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0411081701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Source 8 is offset by -3.786963 and -7.537472 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.047039 x 1.047039, not incorporating fit results [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Source 8 is offset by -4.260547 and -7.730590 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.196667 x 7.372138, not incorporating fit results [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jul 4 10:28:12 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9