[Wed May 30 17:32:08 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (271.1, 320.8) = 11 4 38.69 38 12 25.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 133.5 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 32.0
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Wed May 30 17:32:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.56'
[Wed May 30 23:23:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 30 23:23:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.71"
[Wed May 30 23:23:08 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.629
[Wed May 30 23:23:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 7.71"
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 00:57:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 10.918218 pixels away
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 103.158000, observed total counts = 412.000000
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 31 00:57:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 31 04:09:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 31 04:09:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.71"
[Thu May 31 04:09:49 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.629
[Thu May 31 04:09:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 7.71"
[Thu May 31 05:20:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 05:20:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 05:20:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 05:20:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 05:20:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 05:20:39 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0411081501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Source 5 is offset by 7.149778 and 5.929411 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.886313 x 0.886313, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 31 05:20:48 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9