[Sat Apr 28 11:49:15 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (296.7, 341.0) = 0 40 51.68 41 19 34.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 51.3 +/- 10.1
  Background counts = 21.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Sat Apr 28 11:49:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.09'
[Sat Apr 28 12:13:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Apr 28 12:13:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.97"
[Sat Apr 28 12:13:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.781
[Sat Apr 28 12:13:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 7.97"
[Sat Apr 28 12:49:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 12:49:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 12:49:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18 appears to have run properly
[Sat Apr 28 12:49:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 12:49:48 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 12:49:48 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18 appears to have run properly
[Sat Apr 28 13:25:52 2012] Source 11 is offset by -7.663864 and 6.353744 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.916506 x 0.916506, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Apr 28 13:25:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Apr 28 13:25:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Apr 28 13:25:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Apr 28 13:25:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Apr 28 13:25:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Apr 28 13:49:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Apr 28 13:49:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.97"
[Sat Apr 28 13:49:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.781
[Sat Apr 28 13:49:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 7.97"
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sat Apr 28 14:33:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0410582001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17 appears to have run properly
[Sat Apr 28 15:00:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 155.348000, observed total counts = 155.000000
[Sat Apr 28 15:00:53 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.588836 pixels
[Sat Apr 28 15:00:53 2012] 155.581300 total counts/ 137.928000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.503141
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 11 = 0.588836 pixels
  Position = (296.7, 341.6) = 0 40 51.66 41 19 36.1
  Extent = 2.5 (2.0-4.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 17.7 +/- 12.5
  Background counts = 137.9
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability