[Sat Oct  1 01:50:56 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (458.8, 342.5) = 4 1 8.67 71 45 43.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 159.6 +/- 20.6
  Background counts = 215.0
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Oct  1 01:50:56 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.06'
[Sat Oct  1 01:56:25 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct  1 01:56:25 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.46"
[Sat Oct  1 01:56:25 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.773
[Sat Oct  1 01:56:25 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 12.46"
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 02:48:29 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct  1 04:05:46 2011] Source 13 is offset by -5.935729 and 8.033019 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.037954 x 5.037954, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Oct  1 04:05:46 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct  1 04:05:46 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct  1 04:05:46 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct  1 04:05:46 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct  1 04:05:46 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Oct  1 04:06:10 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.46 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct  1 04:06:10 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.46"
[Sat Oct  1 04:06:10 2011] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.773
[Sat Oct  1 04:06:10 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 12.46"
[Sat Oct  1 04:50:24 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 04:50:24 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 04:50:24 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct  1 04:50:24 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 04:50:24 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 04:50:24 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0410581101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct  1 05:49:13 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 445.968000, observed total counts = 446.000000
[Sat Oct  1 05:49:13 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.807194 pixels
[Sat Oct  1 05:49:13 2011] 435.444700 total counts/ 409.065000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.304289
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.807194 pixels
  Position = (458.2, 341.9) = 4 1 9.23 71 45 45.1
  Extent = 3.5 (3.1-7.5)", rotation angle = 90 (14-90) degrees
  Source counts = 26.4 +/- 20.9
  Background counts = 409.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability