[Wed Mar  7 10:22:12 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (424.3, 333.0) = 21 35 18.37 -62 22 6.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 91.7 +/- 12.5
  Background counts = 34.4
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.004

[Wed Mar  7 10:22:12 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.46'
[Wed Mar  7 11:05:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar  7 11:05:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.16"
[Wed Mar  7 11:05:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.692
[Wed Mar  7 11:05:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 11.16"
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:17:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 291.126000, observed total counts = 253.000000
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar  7 11:34:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar  7 11:48:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar  7 11:48:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.16"
[Wed Mar  7 11:48:22 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.692
[Wed Mar  7 11:48:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 11.16"
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Wed Mar  7 11:53:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0407021001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 292.613000, observed total counts = 253.000000
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 4
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar  7 11:59:21 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0