[Mon May 28 10:24:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (325.9, 218.2) = 19 52 2.06 29 21 18.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.4 +/- 12.0
  Background counts = 35.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Mon May 28 10:24:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.15'
[Mon May 28 10:36:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 10:36:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.50"
[Mon May 28 10:36:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.041
[Mon May 28 10:36:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 9.50"
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 10:54:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 28 11:20:26 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 13.024985 pixels away
[Mon May 28 11:20:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 11:20:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 11:20:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 11:20:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 11:20:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 11:21:50 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 11:21:50 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.50"
[Mon May 28 11:21:50 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.041
[Mon May 28 11:21:50 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 9.50"
[Mon May 28 11:39:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 11:39:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 11:39:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 28 11:39:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 11:39:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 11:39:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0406960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 28 12:03:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 337.979000, observed total counts = 338.000000
[Mon May 28 12:03:15 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.140987 pixels
[Mon May 28 12:03:15 2012] 336.994700 total counts/ 310.825000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.484365
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.140987 pixels
  Position = (325.9, 218.1) = 19 52 2.03 29 21 18.6
  Extent = 2.8 (2.4-6.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 26.2 +/- 18.4
  Background counts = 310.8
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability